Legal Opinion
Plain v. AT & T, Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 24, 2006No. Civ.A. 02-02549(HHK)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
KENNEDY, District Judge.
Fannie Plain, an African American woman, brings this action against her former employer, AT & T Corporation (“AT & T”), pursuant to Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185, alleging that AT & T breached its collective bargaining agreement with her union when it terminated her employment following a period of sickness disability leave and later refused to reinstate her to her prior position. Plain also sues the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), claiming that it: (1) breached its fiduciary duty…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Williams v. SpencerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Turner v. NicholsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- National Shopmen Pension Fund v. DisaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Smith v. Hope Village, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Carson v. SimDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.