Husko v. Geary Electric, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff William Husko (“Plaintiff’) seeks to recover attorney’s fees and actual expenses incurred as a result of the improper removal of this action from state court to federal court by Defendants Geary Electric, Inc. and Axian Communications, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”). This case was remanded to Illinois state court by Judge Marvin E. Aspen who rejected Defendants’ argument that there was federal question jurisdiction by reason of ERISA preemption. Husko v. Geary Electric, Inc., 314 F.Supp.2d 787, 792,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Emil J. Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich) and Reishauer Corporation (Elgin)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Jass v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- David Rice v. Kanu Panchal, M.D., Rodrigo Sotillo, M.D., Rodrigo Sotillo, P.C., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Miranti v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kuntz v. Illinois Central RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
- Kalbfleisch v. Columbia Community Unit School District Unit No. 4District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2009
- Arnhoelter v. KausDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Ewing v. 1645 W. Farragut LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Specialty Contents Group, LLC v. Service 247 of Illinois, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025