Arnhoelter v. Kaus
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Frank Arnhoelter, No. CV-20-00403-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Armin Kaus, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Frank Arnhoelter’s Motion for Attorney’s 16 Fees (Doc. 27) and Motion to Strike (Doc. 38). The Court now rules.1 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 Defendants removed this action to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), 19 asserting diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2) as their basis for removal. 20 (Doc. 1). Shortly afterward, Defendants moved to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.