Ira Holtzman v. Gregory Turza
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Attorney Gregory Turza tried to solicit business by sending fax advertisements to accountants. Three years ago we held that these faxes violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 47 U.S.C. § 227. Ira Holtzman, C.P.A., & Associates, Ltd. v. Turza, 728 F.3d 682 (7th Cir. 2013). The district judge had ordered Tur-za to post a fund of about $4.2 million, stating that he planned to distribute this sum to the class members and donate any remainder to a charity. We reversed that part of the district court’s order. We held that “this action stems from discrete…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Travelers Property Casualty v. GoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Ira Holtzman v. Gregory TurzaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Camp Drug Store, Incorporated v. Cochran Wholesale PharmaceuticCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Griffith v. ContextMedia, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Camp Drug Store, Incorporated v. Cochran Wholesale PharmaceuticCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Castillo v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- KRAKAUER v. DISH NETWORK L.L.C.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.