Legal Opinion

Raub v. Nisbett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Mecosta; Palmer, J. Samuel E. Raub presented a claim against the estate of Stephen S. Wilcox, deceased. The claim was disallowed by the commissioners, and claimant appealed to the circuit court. From a judgment for the estate (William P. Nisbett, administrator), claimant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This case has once been before the court, and for a statement of the case we refer to our decision on the former hearing, reported in 111 Mich. 38. On a second trial of the case at the circuit, a verdict was rendered for the estate, the jury finding an account stated. The case is now before us for review of rulings made on this trial.

In December, 1890, the deceased rendered an account of sales and expenditures to claimant. The deceased continued to reside at Big Rapids until October 1, 1891, when he removed tq*West Superior, Wis. He returned to Big Rapids on one or more occasions for a visit…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Raub v. NisbettMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hawley v. Professional Credit Bureau, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. P. Hoffmaster Sons Co. v. HodgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hawley v. Professional Credit Bureau, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API