Legal Opinion

Hamm v. Hudson Industries, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 13, 1986No. Civ. 5335PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a workmen's compensation case.

In September 1985, Gary Hamm filed a complaint against his former employer, Hudson Industries, Inc., and Underwriter Adjusting Company, seeking workmen's compensation benefits for a job-related hernia allegedly sustained on February 19, 1985. This complaint was later amended to reflect the date of occurrence as February 15, 1985. The trial court denied any benefits to the claimant. His motion for new trial was also denied.

On appeal, the claimant first argues that the trial judge's decision is unsupported by the evidence.

In workmen's compensation cases,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Welch v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. McDonald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. CurtinAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Wallace Roofing Co. v. GanleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. Brown v. AlexanderAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  2. Hinton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  3. Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. Hamm v. Hudson Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Schlumberger Industries, Inc. v. MooreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API