Legal Opinion

Schlumberger Industries, Inc. v. Moore

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 5, 1994No. AV92000823PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

In March 1990, Bobby F. Moore filed a complaint for workmen’s1 compensation benefits, asserting that while he was working for Schlumberger Industries, Inc. (employer), he suffered an injury resulting in a hernia. The employer denied that the hernia was work-related. An ore tenus proceeding was held, which consisted primarily of the testimony of Moore and his attending physician, and the introduction of medical records. The trial court found that Moore had suffered a com-pensable injury and an 80% loss of his ability to earn, and it awarded benefits. The employer appeals,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Bankhead Forest Industries, Inc. v. LovettCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Allen v. Diversified ProductsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Blue Circle, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. Armstrong v. LEWIS & ASSOCIATES CONST. CO.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. 3-M CO., INC. v. MyersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. Ex Parte Dan River, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. 3-M CO., INC. v. MyersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. National Linen Service v. ChandlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  5. National Linen Service v. ChandlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API