Legal Opinion
Hamm v. Hudson Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 27, 1987No. 85-1491PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEATTY, Justice.
We granted certiorari in this workmen’s compensation case to consider the conclusion of the Court of Civil Appeals that the trial court correctly denied petitioner’s motion for new trial based on alleged newly discovered evidence. For the reasons set out below, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and remand the case with directions.
The facts of the case are set out in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. Hamm v. Hudson Industries, Inc., 507 So.2d 933 (Ala.Civ.App.1986). We quote below only that portion of the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Welch v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Gilmer v. SalterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- McDonald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Birmingham Electric Co. v. TonerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. CurtinAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Hinton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
- Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Schlumberger Industries, Inc. v. MooreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Hamm v. Hudson Industries, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.