Mumford v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARFF, Judge:
Roger Mumford appeals from a summary judgment in favor of ITT Commercial Finance Corporation (ITT). He claims ITT tortiously interfered with his economic relations. We reverse and remand.
When reviewing a summary judgment on appeal, we view the facts and inferences reasonably drawn therefrom in a light most favorable to the losing party, in this case Mumford. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. State, 779 P.2d 634, 636 (Utah 1989); van der Heyde v. First Colony Life Ins. Co., 845 P.2d 275, 276 (Utah App.1993). We recite the facts accordingly-
On May 12, 1988, ITT entered a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Straube v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Rollins v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- C.R. Eng. v. Swift Transp. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2019
- C.R. England v. Swift TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Estate of Covington Ex Rel. Covington v. JosephsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Seare v. University of Utah School of MedicineCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Richards Irrigation Co. v. KarrenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.