Legal Opinion

Mumford v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 16, 1993No. 920069-CAPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARFF, Judge:

Roger Mumford appeals from a summary judgment in favor of ITT Commercial Finance Corporation (ITT). He claims ITT tortiously interfered with his economic relations. We reverse and remand.

When reviewing a summary judgment on appeal, we view the facts and inferences reasonably drawn therefrom in a light most favorable to the losing party, in this case Mumford. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. State, 779 P.2d 634, 636 (Utah 1989); van der Heyde v. First Colony Life Ins. Co., 845 P.2d 275, 276 (Utah App.1993). We recite the facts accordingly-

On May 12, 1988, ITT entered a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Straube v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rollins v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. C.R. Eng. v. Swift Transp. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2019
  2. C.R. England v. Swift TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Estate of Covington Ex Rel. Covington v. JosephsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  4. Seare v. University of Utah School of MedicineCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  5. Richards Irrigation Co. v. KarrenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API