Legal Opinion

Michael Pendleton v.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 3, 2013No. 12-3617, 12-3996, 13-1455PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Per curiam

In Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 2460, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), the Supreme Court held that “man datory life without parole for those under the age of 18 at the time of their crimes violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on ‘cruel and unusual punishments.’ ” Corey Grant, Franklin X. Baines, and Michael J. Pendleton (collectively, “Petitioners”), each of whom claims to be serving a mandatory sentence of life without the possibility of parole for offenses committed as juveniles, seek our authorization to file successive habeas corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2254 (for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Donald Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Goldblum v. KlemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Rebecca Lee Falcon v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  2. Maxwell, Ex Parte TerrellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. United States v. Ronald PeppersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. In re MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  5. Evans-Garcia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API