In re Matthews
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge.
This is a consolidated case involving five Petitioners-Michael Matthews, David Dupree, Sebastian Williams, Larry Smith, and Russell McNeill, III-each of whom have filed second or successive habeas petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2)1 to challenge their sentences for their convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Each Petitioner's § 2255 motion argues that § 924(c)(3) 's residual clause is unconstitutionally vague, given its textual similarity to the residual clauses found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Johnson v. United States , --- U.S. ----, 135 S.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In re: Dearnta ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- In Re: Orlando HallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Christopher Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- BERRY v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- BERRY v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.