Donald Bennett v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Chief Judge.
Donald Bennett, a federal prisoner, asks us for permission to file a third motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 for postconviction relief. As recently amended, the statute, so far as relevant here, forbids a second or successive motion unless we certify “as provided in section 2244” that it contains “newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty.” Section 2244(b)(3)(C), the parallel (but not identical)…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Donald Bennett and Steven R. KeithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
3Cited by166 opinions
- Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Samuel Todd Taylor v. Charles R. Gilkey, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Keith Lamont Jordan v. Secretary, DOCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Case v. HatchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Goldblum v. KlemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.