Lahn v. Structural Pest Control Board

Prom a judgment denying a peremptory writ of mandate to defendant, directing it to restore plaintiff’s license and to vacate its decision holding that plaintiff had violated provisions of the Structural Pest Control Act of the State of California, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff contends that:(1) The judgment in the writ of mandate proceedings is not sustained by the evidence upon which the decision was based, and(2) The evidence is insufficient to show that plaintiff was guilty of a violation of the Structural Pest Control Act of the State of California.

These contentions are not available to…