Ex Parte Hoard
Supreme Court of the United States
Petition for a mandamus. The case is stated in the opinion'of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite
The Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad Company began a suit in a State- court of West Virginia to appropriate lands for the use of its road. To this suit the present petitioners, with others, were parties. The company, at a certain stage of the proceedings, filed a petition under the act of March 3, 1875, c.. l:-'>7. for the removal of the suit to the District Court of the United States for the District of West Virginia, having Circuit Court powers. After the petition was filed and security given according to the requirements of the law, a copy of the record of the suit in the' State court, was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. KoontzSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Insurance Co. v. ComstockSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Ward v. GregorySupreme Court of the United States · 1833
3Cited by34 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In Re: Karen A. Briscoe Alfred Lara Wanda T. Kizer Debra Alexander Rhonda Allen Mary Green Glenda D. Abbott and Leslie BalesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Maryland v. Soper, JudgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.