Legal Opinion

Schons v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 8, 2001No. C6-99-1246Published

1Opinion of the Court

621 N.W.2d 743 (2001)

Tammara Stimpert SCHONS, et al., Petitioners, Appellants,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. C6-99-1246.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 8, 2001.

Grannis & Hauge, P.A., Michael J. Dwyer, Virginia A. Dwyer, Eagan, for Appellants.

Meagher & Geer, P.L.L.P., Katherine A. McBride, Minneapolis, for Respondent.

Schwebel, Goetz & Sieben, P.A., Sharon L. Van Dyck, Minneapolis, for Amicus Curiae Minnesota Trial Lawyers.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

In this case, we are required to determine the proper…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API