Legal Opinion
KORES v. Calo
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 22, 2011No. AC 31538PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEAR, J.
The plaintiff, Peter C. Kores, appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding him only nominal damages in his successful action against the defendants, Thomas L. Calo and Gail M. Calo. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that Kemp Road in Winchester, also known as Calo’s Way, was a private road, (2) treated the defendants’ motion for articulation and to set aside the verdict as a motion to set aside the judgment, and (3) failed to award him attorney’s fees and awarded him only nominal damages. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
T…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Filisko v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Plasil v. TablemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Herbert v. SmythSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Meshberg v. Bridgeport City Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Sastrom v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bruno v. BrunoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013