Legal Opinion

Rolfsmeyer v. Rau

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 30, 1936No. 30,947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

Action to recover of the defendant Bertha Rau, appellant here, upon her verbal promise to pay the balance due upon a note given by her husband, G. G. Rau, to plaintiff and also to recover against the husband on the note.

Sometime prior to July 1, 1930, the defendant G. G. Rau gave the plaintiff his promissory note for $1,500 in return for a loan of that amount. Twenty-five to thirty promissory notes of strangers to this action, secured by conditional sale contracts, payable to G. G. Rau, and of the face value of between $2,500 and $3,000, were pledged as security. On or about…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Fullam v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
  3. Lusk v. ThroopIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Grant v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Crane v. WheelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Aslakson v. State Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Mitchell Feed & Seed, Inc. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Allison v. Best Recycling & Disposal, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Smith v. Minneapolis Securities Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API