Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Rothey

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1936No. 8292PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, President:

This suit depends upon whether one who sold crushed stone to a structural contractor should be classed as a subcontractor or a materialman.

The plaintiffs worked for, or furnished materials to, Foster Bland, while he was engaged in the preparation and delivery of crushed stone to defendant, A. G. Rothey. The latter was constructing a dam for the city of Parsons. Rothey paid Bland in full, but Bland did not settle with the plaintiffs. They recovered herein a decree in the circuit court against Rothey and his surety, the defendant Seaboard Surety Company, for the several…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Baker v. Yakima Valley Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Miller v. Cornell-Young Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  5. Morton Motor Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morris County Industrial Park v. Thomas Nicol Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Arcweld Manufacturing Co. v. BurneyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. O'Neal Steel Company v. Leon C. Miles, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Webb v. Blue Lightning Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Kinney Electrical Mfg. Co. v. Modern Electric Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API