Legal Opinion

Miller v. Cornell-Young Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 14, 1933No. 13717PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

Cornell-Young Company was awarded by the State Highway Department of South Carolina a contract for the construction of sections of a highway in Bamberg and Orange-burg Counties. The contractors entered into a contract with one S. E. Eerebe, by which Ferebe agreed to furnish them with the sand they needed for their work. Eerebe employed the plaintiffs to remove a house and the top soil from the pit from which he got the sand which he delivered to Cornell-Young Company, and which was used by them in the construction of the hig-hway.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Molony & Carter Co. v. Pennell & Harley, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  3. Pennington v. Wolf Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McKinstry v. County of CassNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Dominion Culvert & Metal Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Murray v. Aaron Mizell Trucking CompanyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Marsh v. RotheyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. KLINE v. McMEEKIN CONST. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API