Legal Opinion
State v. Frank
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided July 20, 1999No. 24572PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZMAN, Judge.
Pursuant to an Idaho Criminal Rule 11 plea agreement, David Frank pled guilty to felony possession of a controlled substance, I.C. § 37-2732(c), but reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Frank now appeals, asserting that the district court erred in holding that certain physical evidence and Frank’s statements made at the scene of his arrest were admissible. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
On July 1, 1997, at approximately 10:10 p.m., the Kootenai County Sheriffs Department received an anonymous complaint from a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- State v. ParkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. YagerIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. DominguezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.