Legal Opinion

Lescs v. Dow Chemical Co.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided August 8, 1997No. Civil Action 94-0091-CPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TURK, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action under Virginia law for negligence, breach of contract and misrepresentation, with diversity jurisdiction vested in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Plaintiff names William R. Hughes, Inc., and William R. Hughes (collectively “Hughes”), and Dow Chemical Company (“Dow”) as Defendants. Plaintiff is a domiciliary of West Virginia. The Hughes Defendants are domieiliaries of Virginia; Dow is a Delaware corporation. Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages in excess of the statutory requirements for diversity.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  3. Kennett-Murray Corporation v. John E. BoneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. John P. Mack v. United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Papas v. Upjohn Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. EblingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Eriksen v. Mobay Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. M & H Enterprises v. Tri-State Delta Chemicals, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Eriksen v. Mobay Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Benedict v. Hankook Tire Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API