Legal Opinion

Fruge v. Doe

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1997No. 02S01-9601-CV-00005PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Associate Justice.

This case presents for review the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the trial court’s award of summary judgment denying the plaintiffs’ claims under the uninsured motorist statute. That decision is reversed, and the case is remanded.

I

On November 8, 1991, shortly before 6:30 p.m., the plaintiffs, James R. Fruge and Jane Fruge, husband and wife, sustained personal injuries in an automobile accident which occurred as the vehicle operated by Mr. Fruge entered Interstate 40 from Front Street in Memphis. According to their deposition testimony filed by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. McClenahan v. CooleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hobson v. EatonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Estate of Walton v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. R. Douglas Hughes v. New Life Development CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In Re Estate of Ina Ruth BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Green v. GreenTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Pendleton v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API