Legal Opinion

Æolian Co. v. Simpson-Crawford Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided November 2, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. On motion to compel witness to answer questions.

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Circuit Judge.

The purposé of the rule laid down in Blease v. Garlington, 92 U. S. 1, 23 L. Ed. 521, was to bring before the court on appeal all the testimony offered, so that the case might be finally disposed of there without the necessity of sending it bade for testifnony improperly excluded below. When the objection is to relevancy and materiality, the testimony excluded will never get into the record if the ruling is adhered to. But in this case the objection is that the defendant is injecting his defense into the plaintiff’s prima facie case. At the proper stage in the action- all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blease v. GarlingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. H. W. Johns Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Æolian Co. v. Standard Music Roll Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1910
  2. Hussong Dyeing Mach. Co. v. Philadelphia Drying Machinery Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API