Milliken v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. “Grounds- of a motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of evidence, which state that the evidence was admitted ‘over the timely objections of the defendant/ but which fail to show what grounds of objection were then and there urged and overruled by the trial court, present no ques*597tion for decision by this court. Somers v. State, 116 Ga. 535 (3) (42 S. E. 779).” Ingram v. State, 26 Ga. App. 233 (1) (105 S. E. 727). “This court can not consider a ground of a motion for a new trial, alleging error in admitting evidence over the movant’s objection, unless it distinctly appears…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Wells v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Hill v. ChastainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- City of Rome v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- McFarland v. Darien & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Mack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Jolly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Morris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927