Legal Opinion

Morris v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1927No. 17728PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Broyles, O. J.

1. Grounds 1, 2, and 3 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of certain evidence, do not raise any question for determination, since it is not stated in any of those grounds what objections were made to the evidence at the time it was offered, nor does it appear that any motion to rule it out was made. Langston v. State, 153 Ga. 127 (1) (111 S. E. 561), and citations; Milliken v. State, 34 Ga. App. 596 (130 S. E. 347).

2. The excerpt from the charge of the court excepted to was not error for any reason assigned.

3. The alleged newly…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ivey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Langston v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Milliken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Brice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bryan v. Moncrief Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API