Fouche' v. Harison
Supreme Court of Georgia
Practice in Supreme Court. Parties. Service. Master in Chancery. Auditors. Evidence. Bill of Exceptions. Amendment. Contempt. Administrators and Executors. Before Judge Roney. Richmond Superior Court.
Read the full summary
Practice in Supreme Court. Parties. Service. Master in Chancery. Auditors. Evidence. Bill of Exceptions. Amendment. Contempt. Administrators and Executors. Before Judge Roney. Richmond Superior Court. October Term, 1886. On November 1, 1880, William H. Harison, as executor of his deceased wife, Mary G. Harison (formerly Jones), filed a bill, in Richmond superior court, against James S. "Warner, trustee, a non-resident, who was represented by attorney, and Frances L. and Anna M. Harison, individually and as executrixes, non-residents, represented by resident attorneys, William A. Walton and…
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Chief Justice.
We think the trial took place in pursuance of the order of October 22d, 1881. The last paragraph of that order was never excepted to, pendente lite or otherwise, as may be seen by scrutinizing the record from page 249 to 252 (d) inclusive. This paragraph directs “that the case stand for trial upon the original bill and parties complainant as amended December 6th, 1880, and the matters alone responsive thereto in the answers of the several defendants, exclusive of the matters set forth in the cross-bills of the defendants filed as above stated.” Thus the order for trial…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McNulty v. PrudenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
3Cited by12 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Rossi v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Fields v. MichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Luke v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- In Re the Estate of Thomasson v. Boatmen's National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.