Legal Opinion

State v. Causor-Mandoza

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 14, 2005No. C032536CR; A124673PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of custodial interference in the first degree. ORS 163.257. The trial court imposed an upward dispositional departure sentence of 18 months’ imprisonment based on the court’s findings that defendant was on probation at the time of the current offense and that the degree of harm resulting from the offense was greater than typical. The trial court also ordered defendant to pay restitution.

On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in imposing a departure sentence and ordering restitution based on facts not found by a jury beyond a reasonable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Causor-MandozaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API