Legal Opinion

Weekley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 2008No. 28743PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DON E. BURRELL, Presiding Judge.

Gary Weekley (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his request for post-conviction relief brought under Rule 29.15. 1 Mov-ant’s sole point on appeal alleges that the motion court denied him the opportunity for meaningful appellate review by failing to make findings of fact and conclusions of law.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Movant was charged with the class C felony of second-degree burglary, a violation of section 569.170, 2 as a prior and persistent offender. 3 Movant was found guilty after a jury trial and the trial court sentenced him to a term of twenty…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Morrow v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Aundra Woods v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Conley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Phillip G. Payne v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. McCain v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Bode v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API