Legal Opinion

Hickman Construction, Inc. v. South Umpqua State Bank

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 13, 1991No. CV89-0193; CA A66304PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action for intentional interference with business relations, contending that defendant bank wrongfully repossessed plaintiffs’ equipment and thereby prevented them, as joint venturers, from performing a road maintenance project for the United States Army. The tried court directed a verdict for defendant. Plaintiffs appeal, and we reverse.

John Hickman is the principal of plaintiff Hickman Construction, Inc. (Hickman). Ed Funderburk was the principal of plaintiff Funderburk Construction, Inc. (Funderburk). The two corporations formed the joint venture to bid on the Army…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willamette Quarries, Inc. v. WodtliOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Harm v. Central Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kutcher v. ZimmermanHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API