Legal Opinion

United States v. Hancock

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 2, 2016No. Case No.: GJH-13-0274PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

George J. Hazel, United States District Judge

The Court is asked to determine whether a defendant found guilty of robbing a Pizza Hut by pointing a firearm in the direction of store employees, and then leading a battalion of police officers in a high speed chase through residential neighborhoods and the interstate, should face the mandatory minimum sentence imposed under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) for brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a *819crime of violence; a penalty which, here, would be increased in severity under the sentencing guidelines because the defendant has…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. United States v. CastlemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. United States v. John Arena and Michelle WentworthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Kevin FuertesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  2. King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. HernandezDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2017
  4. United States v. ClarkeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
  5. Cameron v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API