Legal Opinion

People v. Lane

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1961PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

The judgments convicting defendants of felony murder and sentencing them to death must be reversed and new trials ordered.

The most substantial errors raised by appellants concern the admissibility of their confessions, nature of the search resulting in discovery of the revolver, sufficiency of evidence corroborating accomplice testimony, and propriety of actions of the District Attorney.

We hold that no error was committed in submitting to the jury, under proper instructions, the voluntary nature of the confessions, although obtained after removal from the county jail, and during a delay in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. CosmeNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Blake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. United States Ex Rel. Charles Everett, Relator-Appellant v. Robert E. Murphy, Warden, Auburn State Prison, Auburn, New York,respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API