Super Service Motor Freight Co., Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARDS, Circuit Judge.
Here plaintiff, a common carrier truck line, brought suit against the United States of America to recover charges for freight it had hauled. The United States defended by asserting setoff and counterclaim for damages which exceeded plaintiff’s charges.
The damage was done to a camera which the United States shipped from Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, to Fort Sill, Oklahoma. On arrival it was found to be damaged beyond repair.
It is conceded that if the United States prevails on the setoff and counterclaim, the damage of $3,515.45 would wipe out the $3,144.56 of freight bills…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Secretary of Agriculture v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Plough, Inc. v. The Mason and Dixon LinesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Maggard Truck Line, Inc. v. Deaton, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1978
- American Hoist & Derrick Company v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Scott v. J. J. Brady & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.