Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 31, 1978No. Civ. R-77-0180 TJMPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MacBRIDE, Chief Judge.

This opinion addresses the question of whether the Southern Pacific Transportation Company, plaintiff herein, as part of its case in chief against the defendant, United States, must carry the burden of proving that it was free of any contributory negligence. The United States argues that this result is mandated by the application of the so-called Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 20(11), with its attendant burdens of proof.

Briefly, the factual and procedural setting of this case is as follows. On April 28, 1973, eighteen bomb-laden boxcars exploded in the Antelope…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Intransit, Inc. v. Excel North American Road Transport, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2006
  2. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1979
  3. Symington v. Great Western Trucking Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1987
  4. Hammond Lead Products, Inc. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API