Legal Opinion

Maggard Truck Line, Inc. v. Deaton, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided October 21, 1983No. Civ. A. C82-779APublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROBERT H. HALL, District Judge.

This case stems from the destruction by fire of 80 bales of cotton while en route from Texas to North Carolina. The case is now before this court on plaintiffs, Maggard Truck Line, Inc. (Maggard), motion in limine and request for pretrial rulings. Jurisdiction is pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. For the reasons stated hereinafter plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part.

FACTS

On August 13, 1980, L.T. Barringer & Co. (Barringer) consigned 80 bales of cotton to Maggard. The cotton was to be shipped from Harlinger, Texas to Kannapolis, North Carolina.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ReissSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. EF Operating Corp. v. American BuildingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Philip Morris v. American Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Breckenridge Creste Apartments, Ltd. v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1993
  4. Jones Motor Co., Inc. v. Teledyne, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
  5. People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education, School District 205District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API