In Re the Care & Treatment of Canupp
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEATHERS, J.:
The State brought this action under the Sexually Violent Predator Act, S.C.Code Ann. §§ 44-48-10 to -170 (Supp.2007), for a determination that Appellant was a sexually violent predator in need of involuntary civil commitment in a secure facility for long-term control, care, and treatment. A jury found that Appellant was a sexually violent predator, and the circuit court ordered that Appellant be committed to the South Carolina Department of Mental Health. Appellant challenges the commitment order on the ground that the circuit court failed to charge the jury that Appellant had a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re the Care & Treatment of ManigoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- In re the Care & Treatment of ManigoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012