Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Sun Furniture & Appliance Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 13, 1978No. Nos. C-77606 and C-77630PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBettman, J.
This cause came on to be heard upon the appeal; the transcript of the docket, journal entries and original papers from the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County; the transcript of the proceedings; and the briefs and the arguments of counsel.
Two principal issues are raised by these consolidated appeals: first, whether prejudgment wage attachments are lawful in Ohio; and, second, whether proof of an intent to deceive is required before a supplier can be found to have committed a deceptive act or practice in violation of R. C. 1345.02.
The genesis of the action was the mailing by defendant,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Beneficial Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Beneficial Management Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Chrysler Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Doherty, Clifford, Steers & Shenfield, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, Merck & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- S. Dean Slough v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Eagle v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Delahunt v. Cytodyne TechnologiesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Frey v. Vin Devers, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Funk v. Montgomery amc/jeep/renaultOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Richards v. Beecumont VolvoOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.