Legal Opinion

Funk v. Montgomery amc/jeep/renault

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1990No. Case C-890178PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause came on to be heard upon the appeal, the transcript of the docket, journal entries and original papers from the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, the transcriptof the proceedings, the assignments of error, and the briefs and arguments of counsel.

In this appeal we are concerned with a dispute that arose after the plaintiff-appellant, Bev Funk, purchased a new 1982 Renault Le Car imported by the defendant-appellee, American Motors Sales Corp. ("AMSC"), from the defendant-appellee, Montgomery AMC ("MAMC"). After encountering mechanical difficulties with the cooling and electrical…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Inglis v. American Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Goddard v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. McCullough v. Bill Swad Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
  2. Harold L. Bushendorf v. Freightliner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Neal v. SMC Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  4. Renner v. Derin Acquisition Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Richards v. Beecumont VolvoOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API