Legal Opinion

Olds v. Hosford

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1960No. 2918, 2919PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harns Berger

The following is our understanding of the capacities and relationships of the parties and several interests connected with this litigation.

1. Lloyd’s of London places with its members coverages of insurance.

2. Underwriters are those members of the group at Lloyd’s who elect to participate collectively in carrying an insurance risk.

3. H. J. Symons and Company was a Lloyd broker in London who placed the insurance coverage in this case with certain underwriter-members at Lloyd’s.

4. Pierce, Miller & Company were the representatives in the United States of the underwriters at Lloyd’s who carried…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Strom v. FeltonWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Yellowstone Sheep Co. v. EllisWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Finance Corp. v. Commercial Credit Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Knight v. Beckwith Commercial Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bongiovi v. SullivanNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Kvenild v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. St. Luke Evangelical Lutheran Church, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Alexander v. MedunaWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Wells Fargo Bank Wyoming, N.A. v. HodderWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API