Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Turk

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 20, 1938PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought by plaintiffs, Clarence and Vera Gardner, to recover damages for the death of their minor son, Eugene, aged eleven years, who it is claimed was struck and killed by defendant's automobile, driven by himself. There was a verdict and judgment for defendant, from which plaintiffs appealed. The questions presented by the appeal relate to the giving of certain instructions on behalf of defendant and the refusal of one requested by plaintiffs.

The petition alleges two specifications of negligence, viz.: Negligence under the humanitarian doctrine, in that defendant saw or by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Feary v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Dempsey v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Griffith v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  4. Pence v. Kansas City Laundry Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Koebel Ex Rel. Koebel v. Tieman Coal & Material Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Maybach v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Lewis Ex Rel. Piening v. ZagataSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. West v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. Wipfler v. BaslerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Mendenhall v. NeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API