Legal Opinion

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1990PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The trial court did not err in admitting into evidence on the People’s direct case certain portions of the defendant’s testimony given at a prior trial on the instant indictment (see, People v Josan, 104 AD2d 1051; see also, United States v Grunewald, 164 F Supp 644; cf., People v Singleton, 138 AD2d 544; People v Castillo, 3 AD2d 963). For the most part, that testimony constituted judicial admissions and was received into evidence pursuant to a long-standing exception to the hearsay rule (see, People v Harris, 148 AD2d 469; People v Duncan, 57 AD2d 638; People v Corbo, 17 AD2d 351, 354-355;…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. LicitraNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. RumbleNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. United States v. GrunewaldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. BurgosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. KellerNew York Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API