United States v. Grunewald
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
Can the Government properly introduce into evidence as admissions binding solely on defendant Halperin portions of Halperin’s testimony given upon the first trial?
On Friday, the 6th of June, the prosecution stated outside the hearing and presence of the jury that it intended to offer into evidence during the course of the present trial certain portions of defendant Halperin’s testimony given at the first trial. Such prior testimony would be offered solely against Halperin and not against Grünewald and Bolich.
In behalf of Halperin it was argued by his counsel that such…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Jim B. Edmonds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Eddie M. Harrison v. United States of America, Orson G. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- People v. DownerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.