Legal Opinion
DeLeo v. City of Stamford
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 14, 1995No. 592CV80 (EBB)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO STRIKE
ELLEN B. BURNS, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff David DeLeo brings this action against the City of Stamford alleging discriminatory treatment on the basis of disability in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 792 et. seq. He demands a jury trial and seeks reinstatement, back pay, compensatory and punitive damages, costs and attorney’s fees. The defendant moves to strike the demand for a jury trial as well as the claims for compensatory and punitive damages. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to strike is denied in part with…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- John Doe v. County Of CentreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Doe v. County of Centre, PACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Bartlett v. New York State Board of Law ExaminersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Hernandez v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- Saylor v. RidgeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.