Legal Opinion

Ruckelschaus v. Oehme

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On demurrer to bill and order to show cause why injunction should not issue.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

The object of this bill is to restrain the entry of judgment upon a verdict in an action for mesne profits following a judgment in ejectment.

The ground of relief is that the conduct of the defendant’s intestate, who was plaintiff in ejectment, had been such as to render it inequitable that she should recover and collect from complainant a certain portion of the verdict, and as to the balance complainant offers to pay and has paid it to the defendant without prejudice.

On presenting the bill with affidavits annexed an order to show ■cause with interim restraint was made, and on its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Job Haines Home for Aged People v. KeeneNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  2. Allegheny v. ShoenbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hollander v. AbramsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  2. Falcon B. L. Assn. v. SchwartzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  3. Muller v. ThomannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API