Legal Opinion

Muller v. Thomann

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 25, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The bill is to recover dower in a property in Union Hill, Hudson county, conveyed by the complainant's late husband, Ernest Muller, to the defendant Thomann, in 1920. The deed was signed by one Katherine Thomser Muller as wife of Ernest. The defendant, the Trust Company of New Jersey, holds a mortgage on the property given by Thomann to raise the purchase money.

Ernest and the complainant were married in 1896 and lived in Brooklyn ten years, when he abandoned her and their six children, eloping with Katherine, a shop girl in his bakery. The two came to Newark, stayed for nine months, then…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Martin's Heirs v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  2. Sadler v. NieszWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Smith v. FullerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. H. W. Wright Lumber Co. v. McCordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Beeman v. KitzmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morris v. GlaserNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API