Dearybury v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice TOAL:
Petitioner was convicted of criminal domestic violence (CDV) in municipal court. No direct appeal was taken. Al*37most four years later, Petitioner filed an application for post-conviction relief (PCR). The PCR court denied Petitioner relief. We remand for a hearing to determine whether Petitioner knowingly and voluntarily proceeded pro se at trial.
FACTUAL / PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In August 1996, Petitioner and his wife were separated and had filed for divorce. Petitioner retained an attorney to represent him in the divorce action. Shortly thereafter, on September 10, 1996,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Caprood v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. SimsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- White v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Scott v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Marcus Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025