Scott v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Chief Justice.
[T1] A jury convicted Vincent James Scott of first degree sexual assault, aggravated assault and child abuse. He appeals, claiming the district court denied his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial and imposed an illegal sentence. We affirm.
ISSUES
[12] Mr. Seott states the issues for our consideration as follows:
I. Did the trial court arbitrarily deny Vincent Scott his constitutional right to represent himself during the criminal proceedings against him?
II. By running misdemeanor sentences concurrent with consecutive felony sentences, did the trial court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Wesley WillieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- State v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Osborn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HightowerOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Reifer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Andrew James Keller v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2024
- Christopher Mark Nesius v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Timothy W. Greene v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023