Legal Opinion

Call v. Marler

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1965No. 9531PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNUDSON, Justice.

Plaintiffs-Respondents, J. Hyrum Call, Elizabeth H. Call, as co-trustees, W. W. Dillard and Essie Dillard, husband and wife, commenced this action seeking a partition or sale of 160 acres of land which they held as tenants in common with defendants-appellants, Virgil H. Marler and Alice Marler, husband and wife. Defendants filed their answer contending the property could not be partitioned, and also by way of counterclaim sought an accounting of rents and profits allegedly received by plaintiffs and their predecessors in interest while they occupied or had the use of the land…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Angleton v. AngletonIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Merrill v. MerrillIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. NeillIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Cox v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Bradford v. SchmuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. VelasquezUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Workman Family Partnership v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sundowner, Inc. v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Clements v. ClementsIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API