Legal Opinion

Cox v. City of Pocatello

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1955No. 8244PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Respondents in a single action seek mandate to compel appellants, during irrigation seasons to permit the flow of respondents’ allotted irrigation water through a ditch or canal extending southerly through the townsite of the City of Pocatello, and to deliver the water to respondents’ ditch at the city’s south boundary; and for recovery of damages to their gardens and crops, allegedly caused by the city’s refusal so to deliver the water during the forepart of the 1952 irrigation season.

The action was tried upon a stipulation of facts, evidence adduced and affidavits filed by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Horkan v. City of MoultrieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Boise City v. SinselIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Daly v. StokellSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Thrift v. . Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Westminster Water Co. v. Mayor of WestminsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harkness v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Jorstad v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. McLean v. City of Spirit LakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. First of Denver Mortgage Investors v. C. N. Zundel & AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. NeillIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API