Legal Opinion

Central Bank & Trust Co. of Houston v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 5, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

Plaintiff in error sued J. H. Hill and A. E. Masterson as makers of a promissory note for $6,000, dated December 23, 1909, due 90 days after date, payable to the order of plaintiff in error. It was alleged that Masterson, before the delivery of the note, indorsed his name across the back thereof, obligating and binding himself to pay the note according to its terms ' and effect, and that the note was the joint and several obligation of both defendants.

Hill answered formally, and Masterson answered, in substance: That after Hill had executed the note sued on to the order of plaintiff, which he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Benson v. PhippsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Cabaness v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Belverman v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Burrow v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Norton v. WochlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Darby v. Farmers' State Bank of BurkburnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Jack M. Finley, Inc. v. Longview Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Southern Surety Co. v. LaffertyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Cruse v. GauCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. George v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API