Payne v. Erie Insurance Exchange
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Concurrence
WATTS, J,
concurring, in which HARRELL and BATTAGLIA, JJ, join.
Respectfully, I concur in the judgment only.1 I would hold that, where a named insured has expressly prohibited a second permittee from driving a vehicle, coverage under an omnibus clause may extend to the second permittee only if, at the time of the accident: (1) the first permittee is in the vehicle; (2) the second permittee is using the vehicle for some purpose or benefit of the first permittee; and (3) the use of the vehicle is within the scope of permission for use that the named insured granted.
*400After a thorough review of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hardware Mutual Casualty v. SameCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Federal Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Bond v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Melvin v. American Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Maryland Indemnity Insurance v. KornkeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.